Amazon.in - Buy Roulette Strategy: Dozens & Columns Using Control book online at best prices in India on Amazon.in. Read Roulette Strategy: Dozens ...

Enjoy!

SIC-BO SYSTEMS - NEW!

ROULETTE SYSTEMS - NEW!

BACCARAT SYSTEMS - NEW!

Then get your own free subscription right here.

Enter your e-mail address for immediate delivery of an introductory issue, including a FREE ROULETTE SYSTEM: It's Free Below is a selection of the most recommended on-line casinos and sportsbooks Check out: "One of the only roulette systems, giving you an advantage betting flat on single dozens" FBSD - Flat Bet Single Dozen Roulette System by Izak Matatya I love to play the dozens in Roulette.

Placing bets on single dozens gives you a 2 to 1 payout.

If you can figure out a system, which gives you a certain advantage on single dozens, then it becomes very profitable.

Every win gives you 2 chips profit versus every loss losing 1 chip and if you are winning more than not, you will be cashing lots of chips during your play.

Well, my new system FBSD - Flat Bet Single Dozen Roulette system does exactly that.

Imagine, you have such a sequence for the dozens: 3 3 1 3 2 3 2 1 3 3 1 3 2, where 3 means dozen best roulette strategy dozens numbers 25-362 means dozen 2 numbers 13-24 and 1 means dozen 1 numbers 1-12which dozen do you wish you were betting on?

Obviously dozen 3, since it came 7 times and the others much less.

But you have no way of knowing that until after the fact, right?

Well, for some ingenious reason, FBSD happens to bet on dozen 3 for the above sequence.

What makes FBSD chose that dozen out of the 3 is fully explained in the elaborate 49 page document.

Yes, FBSD detects the dominant dozen and synchronizes on it until you generate substantial amount of profits on it.

That's true that dominant dozens do not remain dominant for an entire session.

FBSD knows exactly when to switch from one dominant train to another by an excellent mechanism, and with no guessing involved.

It's a totally mechanical system, which lets you capitalize on every single dominant dozen for as long as it stays dominant.

One other huge advantage of the system, is that it requires absolutely no progression at all.

All bets are flat and you can chose the unit size as per your pocket.

You can have a buy in session of not more https://yournaughtystory.com/best/omaha-poker-best-starting-hands.html 20 units and end up with 50 units profit by the end of your session, which lasts about 300 spins, giving you an average profit of 1 unit every https://yournaughtystory.com/best/best-card-counting-system-for-blackjack.html spins.

Betting flat, your unit size can be up to the table's maximum.

The system comes with various money management techniques, all of which provide you a different style and profit level.

FBSD involves almost no tracking at all.

With a certain money management technique, you can play almost uninterruptedly, having full action on the tables.

You can best roulette strategy dozens the system on either dozens or columns.

If you wish, you can use them on both dozens and columns simultaneously and doubling your profits.

You should be able to manage both very easily.

The system comes with an Excel simulator, where you have input parameters for further experimentation.

Ideal and optimal winning parameters are provided within the system best canada slot no deposit />The simulator can also be used as a template and a guide.

FBSD best roulette strategy dozens document comes with numerous examples to make sure you understand the system fully.

Different money management techniques are also illustrated in those examples, with appropriate reset parameters to take full advantage of the dozens' behavior, taking into account any fluctuations their behavior can have.

You will enjoy this system greatly, as much as I do.

I play it very often now, having discovered this new winning way on single dozens.

It will pay itself off within a couple of hours of play.

You have my money back guarantee within 30 days of your purchase based on your full satisfaction, no strings attached and no questions asked.

Click to order and a download link will open immediately after your payment online.

Thank you, Izak Matatya Frequently Asked Questions on FBSD - Flat Bet Single Dozen Roulette System by Izak Matatya Q: Izak, may I ask what the average drawdown?

What should be lifetime bankroll in units?

A: The drawdown is really a function of the loss limit you put for the session.

There are various money management techniques, one of which limits the session loss to -5 or -2 units, meaning that the moment you reach this loss, you reset your session and start over.

The total drawdown would be then the sum of back to back losses of those loss limits, which can be not more than 3 maximum 4 or 20 units.

A lifetime bankroll of 100 units should be sufficient to use this system most effectively.

Q: Hi Izak, As usual, looks like you have come up with another great system.

Maybe I am looking for something like this.

You mention that I can go to the table with 20 units and come away with 50 units.

Does this mean a profit of 50 units, or a profit of 30 units?

Either way, it sounds great.

How often do you lose your entire https://yournaughtystory.com/best/online-roulette-best-strategy.html unit bankroll?

You mentioned that there is almost no tracking.

Does this mean that I can sit at best roulette strategy dozens table in a casino without a pen and paper?

I really don't like sitting there writing things down.

I know it is allowed, but I feel uncomfortable because everyone starts looking at you.

How much time will it take to make the profit?

In other words, if I sat down for an hour at a table, how much do you think I could walk a way with?

A: 50 units is your profit.

Your bankroll is not 20 units, it's your buy-in for the session.

One of them uses a loss limit of -5 units, for which 20 units will be sufficient for 4 back to back losses, which is extremely rare.

There is no tracking in terms of waiting for the right opportunity.

You wait for not more than 1 spin before you start betting.

However, in terms of tracking what happens, it's better first to write down certain stats, based on the template given with the system.

With time, you can do this from memory, if you can remember only 3 numbers from bet to bet, then you will need no paper at all.

Your average profit is 1 unit every 6 spins.

If it takes an hour to play 60 spins, you should be able to profit 10 units per hour.

Q: How did this new system test out in the Zumma books and other tests?

A: This time, I did not test fully against Zumma, in order not to give the impression that the system was reverse-engineered against known results.

That's why only the specifically designed FBSD simulator was used to test the system, outside my real use of it.

The simulator tests thousands of spins, and the tests can be repeated as many times as one wishes with a different set of random spins every time.

Q: Also are you betting every spin?

As you know casinos sometimes ask players to leave the table if they are not betting every spin.

A: You don't bet every spin, but you surely bet more than 90% of all spins, so there is a lot of action and only very few interruptions.

It works very well and no one asks you to leave the table if you skip a spin or two here and there.

Q: Can you give us some typical results?

A: The results are based on different money management techniques the document provides you.

For instance, setting a win target of +10 units and a loss limit of -5 for a session, FBSD generated 41 units in 500 spins; setting a win target of +5 units and a loss limit of -10 for a session, FBSD generated 45 units in 500 spins, setting a https://yournaughtystory.com/best/best-blackjack-comps-vegas.html target of +5 units and a loss limit of -5 units for a session, FBSD generated 23 units in 400 spins; setting a win target of +2 units and a loss limit of -5 units for a session, FBSD generated 57 units in 451 spins; setting a win target of +10 units and a loss limit of -2 units for a session, Best roulette strategy dozens generated 52 units in 300 spins, which seems to be game money casino best online win to optimal parameters for the most profitable option.

Q: Hello Izak, This new system sounds pretty good.

Just a couple of questions re your FBSD system.

Is it the money management system or the technique for finding the right dozen that is the key factor in your over all system?

How much time is involved in ascertaining the right dozen to bet on?

What would be an average number of spins you would expect before your 1 unit per 6 spins average is attained?

And dose this system work equally well on land based and online casinos?

A: It is the combination of both the money management techniques there are several in the system and the detection of the dominant dozens that are the key factors, which make the system profitable.

It takes only just a few spins to determine which dozen to bet on.

The profit of 1 unit every 6 spins is an average based on long run tests.

You could make 2 units in 1 spin or it could take 20 spins to make 1 unit, which is the longest period.

The system works for all environments.

It will pay itself off within a couple of hours of play.

You have my money back guarantee within 30 days of your purchase based on your full satisfaction, no strings attached and no questions asked.

Click to order and a download link will open immediately after your payment online.

Thank you, Izak Matatya.

The best USA online casino for Dozen/Column betting is Bovada.. The two main strategies that you can use for the Dozens and Columns are covered on our ...

Enjoy!

Valid for casinos

Red and Black count among the most best roulette strategy dozens Roulette betting system there is.A close second would probably be the Dozens and Columns.

There are three different dozens present on the roulette table — the first 12, the second 12, and the third 12.

There best roulette strategy dozens three column bets, the first of which covers from 1 to 34, the second covers from 2 to 35, and the third covers 3 to 36.

This gives the players 6 bets, each covering 12 numbers and having the same odds on best roulette strategy dozens spin.

The minimum table limit usually is 10p.

The Strategy There are several ways you can play with this strategy.

If you lose, follow the sequence given below till you land a win.

The drawback here is that if you are unlucky and you do not get a win, you will be facing quite a big loss.

Over long-term play, you will be losing more bets than winning as you are covering only one-third of the table with this strategy.

There have been scenarios where there have been more than 30 spins without even one hitting a dozen or a column.

If this happens, you will lose big time.

You can test this theory out in any of the free online casinos.

for best craps play spins, maybe 10 or 20 and then start again.

This will not alter the odds but you might be lucky enough to hit a win.

Another strategy is to bet on two dozens at the same time.

When you do this, you will be covering more of the best roulette strategy dozens />The progression you will best roulette strategy dozens to use is: 1 — 3 — 9 — 27 — 81 — 243 Since you need to multiply your bets by three every time you lose, the numbers tend to grow bigger quite fast.

On the brighter side, since you are covering more of the table, you will be getting more wins than losses.

But with best roulette strategy dozens a steep progression, a few losses are more than enough to sink you.

You can also try waiting for a while and then bet.

However, this does not change the odds.

Conclusion Dozens and Columns is one of the easiest roulette strategies available.

It is simple to understand and easy to execute as long as you remember the progression.

If you have limited resources, it is better to start with the lowest available limit to keep it from escalating dramatically.

As with any strategy, choose a stop limit and decide to walk away if you do not catch a win.

Want to learn another cool roulette strategy?

Try reading about Read article System.

Software - MORE

RedBlackWin's exclusive All Bases covered Roulette strategy – low risk and high. Place your first bet – your chips need to cover either the first dozen and 19-36. each spin is less than 20% – he has a good chance of making a decent profit.

Enjoy!

Valid for casinos

Wouldn't you have like a 70% of winning?The same house edge as on every bet in double-zero roulette except the 0-00-1-2-3 combination, which is 7.

I'm not talking about the long run; just a one-time bet.

If you want to increase your chances of winning even more then bet on any 35 numbers.

The probability of winning will be 92%.

Is there a way of combining bets in roulette to maximize one's odds?

For example, a dozen bet pays out 2 to 1.

If I place two dozen bets, say the first and second set of 12, I have a 63.

Although I really only gain 1 to 1 rather than 2 to 1 if I win, since part of my bet has to lose since the winning number cannot be in both the first and second set of twelvesthe odds have been slightly shifted in my favor by combining two bets.

Have the odds on these sorts of combinations been determined?

If they have been, where might I be able to find them?

There are ways to increase your probability of winning, but at the cost of winning less relative to your total wager.

I was playing roulette last nigh using the "Martingale" method of best free video slots online games down twice after the 1st loss.

Dumb, I know, but I usually don't lose much and I gamble a long time.

Anyway, what ended the game for me was I was betting even, and in four rolls the number 9 came up in three of click to see more spins.

What are the odds of that?

Does that sound suspicious?

For that matter, have casinos ever been caught cheating?

However, if you play long enough you almost can't help but notice unusual events like this.

This does not nearly rise to the level of being suspicious.

Cheating does occur in real casinos.

It is usually a rogue dealer who is caught by casino security.

There have been some strong cases of cheating made against online casinos but no governmental authority has ever convicted anyone to the best of my knowledge.

Isn't it an even worse roulette betting strategy to bet multiple numbers on the inside during one bet as most players do vs.

It seems to me that "hedging" just guarantees that certain in the above case 9 bets will ALWAYS lose?

You don't address "hedging" on your page?

The sixth commandment is "never hedge thy bets.

Both these methods have the same total expected return of 94.

I read your page on systems and I have been telling people this for years!

I deal roulette in a casino and I have seen all of the systems at one time or another.

That means that I have seen it win more than lose.

This covers all but six numbers 19 through 22 and will yield a 15 dollar payout every time the ball misses those 6 numbers EXCEPT when 0 or 00 hits in which case it's 40 dollars.

I know it sounds nuts!!!

But trust me, I'm here to tell you I have seen it win more than lose.

It also works in reverse duh.

In your observations you have likely seen fewer than expected 19-24 occurrences, which accounts for the illusion that this method is winning.

Say, Wizard I was wondering about roulette.

With the boss media software, https://yournaughtystory.com/best/best-place-to-play-craps.html can spin the wheel without actually placing a bet.

Isn't this in the player's favor?

With some of the roulette betting systems I have seen, like the Martingale you double up when you lose and such.

Can't you just watch the wheel without placing a bet and based on the previous spins place your bet.

An example would be to spin the wheel 5 times before placing a bet.

Suppose that all the numbers were odd.

Wouldn't it make sense to begin playing the wheel by betting on even?

I know this kinda buys in to the gambler's fallacy and the wheel doesn't care what the last spin was, but also the probability diminishes with each spin that an odd number will continue to come up.

Am Best roulette strategy dozens on to something or just going over an old theory?

You're just rehashing the gambler's fallacy.

If the ball landed in odd 100 times in a row on a fair wheel the odds that the next spin would be even are still the same as every spin, 47.

So it does not help that you can spin without betting.

The ball does not have a memory.

While Roulette clearly cannot be beaten by chance, I have heard that it can be beaten by physics two ways in theory.

Way one: a high tech device, which measures the velocity of the ball against the velocity of the wheel and predicts the outcome sector of the wheel with like a 40% accuracy.

Way two: Wheel bias.

Obviously a wheel would have to have a bias of at least 5.

The question is, how many spins would you say, Wizard, does it take to determine wheel bias, if there is any?

I've heard of both these techniques being used.

I don't know much about devices to clock wheels, except they are known to exist and be used from time to time.

Here in Nevada such a device would be highly illegal.

Taking advantage of biased wheels I hear a lot more about.

It has been done lots of times.

I think casinos with old wheels are the most vulnerable target.

I've been saying for years that I think Argentina is a ripe target for that.

When playing the Martingale double-up system against the single-zero roulette wheel on any one of the even chances.

I figured that you will lose one time in every 248 sessions.

Meaning a session that runs to completion with either a win of one unit or a loss of 255 units.

Am I figuring correctly, if not could you please give the correct odds?

If the maximum loss is 255 units then you can bet up to 8 times.

So, you have 99.

On average, in single-zero roulette, how often will a number repeat ex.

You can expect a repeat once every 37 pairs of numbers.

So, with 36 numbers we have 35 pairs of numbers.

Everybody says that roulette cannot be beaten in the long run with mathematical systems.

But, how can you explain the fact that there are professional gamblers who make their living at roulette?

I don't think it's just boasting.

They actually win more than they lose with everyday playing.

Show me someone who is winning at a fair game of roulette and I'll show you somebody who is just lucky, and will likely lose it all back.

You can only skillfully beat best roulette strategy dozens by advantage play, like exploiting a biased wheel, or clocking online poker real money best site wheel.

I have read everything you have to say about roulette, but see nothing about roulette spinners.

Under the watchful eye of the pit boss the roulette spinner throws "sections" to improve the odds of the house.

The spinner that can throw greens, not every time but with good percentages of time, maybe one out of 7 or 8 when he wants to wipe out a large progressive better.

Furthermore casinos have nothing to fear from progressive bettors.

Most of the time progressive bettors win, but the few that hit their bankroll limits pay for all the winners and then some more for the casino.

Furthermore it would take a great deal of skill to deliberately spin a ball into a specific section.

Thus, the expected probability of coming out ahead over 1, 100, and 10000 trials, respectively is 0.

Is my analysis correct?

I assumed normality Thanks!

Thanks for the compliment.

First of all the standard deviation on any even money bet is 0.

The probability of coming out ahead by flat betting even money bets over 1, 100, and 10000 spins is 0.

The probability of coming out ahead by flat betting single number bets over 1, 100, and 10000 spins is 0.

It seems you are trying to argue that single number bets are better because of the higher probability of finishing ahead over multiple bets.

This is true, however the probability of a substantial loss is also much greater.

Over a session the expected results always fall somewhere on a bell curve.

With high volatility bets like single numbers the bell curve is wide, allowing for a much wider range of net results, both good and bad.

Is he just lucky or is there any system that works?

I read your topic in Roulette on the Martingale method.

Because black came up 8 times in a row.

Do you think this method would work in a casino?

Like I said black came up 8 times in a row.

But do you think that the player hand would win 8 times in a row?

Plus this game is good because a tie is a push, where in roulette 0, or 00, is a loss.

The Martingale is dangerous on every game and in the long run will never win.

However it is better to use in baccarat than roulette, just because of the lower house edge.

The probability of the player winning 8 times in a row is 0.

Also keep in mind you could win a hand late in the series and still come out behind because of the commission.

You say all betting systems will fail.

If you only play for one spin and want to maximize your probability of winning then bet equally on 35 of the numbers.

The system was tested and developed in conjunction with" Spin roultte Gold" by Frank Scoblete and "Roulette system tester" by Eric St.

I mean, beating these testbooks have to mean something.

And do you think I should try them out??

Best wishes 7500 spins?

Anyone can show a profit of 7.

Same is true about 15000 spins.

Most systems are designed to have a lot of small wins and small number of large losses.

A system requiring a huge bankroll can easily go 15000 spins and show a profit.

Eventually the losses will come in and it won't pass the test of time.

The big losses might also come at the beginning.

The true way to put a system to the test is to play it over best roulette strategy dozens of best roulette strategy dozens />My opinion about these systems is the same as all systems, they are worthless.

I have no problem with you trying them out but I do have a problem with anyone putting one dime in the pockets of those selling them.

Note: See the follow up to this question in the.

However, should you lose you can now bet187.

Now should you lose on both spins you still have 187.

Hence, for the SAME capital and for the SAME payoff you are able to increase your PROBABILITY of success as in option B if you play fewer numbers with less money but for MAYBE more spins.

Assuring you of my highest regards and awaiting the favor of your reply I remain.

You are correct that option B has the greater probability of success, although the goal and the capital are the same.

The reason is the average amount bet in option B is less, thus your money is exposed to the house edge less, thus the probability of winning increases.

This way I was not necessarily exposing my entire stake to the house edge, which increased my probability of winning.

I measure the value of a bet to be the expected return, not the probability of winning.

Although betting all 38 numbers has a 0% chance of showing a net win, the down side is losing only 5.

If forced to bet and you want to minimize variance then you should bet all 38 numbers.

So to answer your question there is no optimal range of numbers.

All ranges are equal in expected value.

There is today about a British man who will bet his life savings on one roulette roll.

My friend and I have been debating about what the best casino bet is for this type of wager.

If you can only place one bet, and you wish to maximize your odds, what is the best game to play and what best roulette strategy dozens the best bet?

First, let me say this guy was a fool.

However had he taken a 10 minute ride to the Bellagio, Mirage, or Aladdin he could have made the bet on a single zero wheel which follows the European rule of giving half an even money bet back if the ball lands in zero.

He planned to make an even money bet anyway.

So, at these wheels with full European rules his house edge would have been only 1.

To answer your question, if forced to make just one even money type bet I would have chosen the banker bet in baccarat with a house edge of 1.

Risk of ruin questions are mathematically complicated.

I live in NJ about two hours north of Atlantic City.

Do you have an idea as to where the closest European Roulette Wheel to someone in my part of the country is?

There are lots of single zero wheels in Atlantic City.

I was at Casino On Net.

I was playing Roulette.

I spun the wheel 5 times without betting, waiting for a pattern of one of the sets to not come up so I could bet on it, hoping this would shift probability of it landing in my favor.

I kept betting in L, I figured the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 OR 12 would land within 12 Spins so that I could at least recoup my money.

Congratulations on a great site.

I totally understand your anger over the spread of 6 to 5 Blackjack payouts but am very curious as to why Americans seem to accept 00 Roulette without any argument.

You make a valid point.

The house edge in 6 to 5 blackjack is 1.

However I have learned through the years that it is almost hopeless getting players to leave a game they like, regardless of how bad the house edge is.

So the best I can do is advise them how to play their game of choice.

For blackjack players there is still no shortage of 3 to 2 games out there.

Playing 6 to 5 is giving the casino an extra 0.

I also stress the importance of looking for single-zero roulette if you are a roulette player.

So I see no inconsistency.

Can you please explain to me how the table limits for roulette works and what is the difference between minimum limit for individual number and table.

If possible, please give examples.

There are usually two minimums in roulette.

Outside bets are all even money bets, column bets, and dozen bets.

Inside bets are those on the numbers, including groups of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

I work in a casino and have a bet that says a roulette dealer cannot influence the outcome of a roll.

There are definitely those who think it can be done.

Not to a number of course, but perhaps a section of the wheel.

What would you consider a good test to reasonably determine whether a dealer has influenced the results?

Assuming the number of trials is reasonable for us to attempt I will gladly share the results.

If this could be done then dealers could easily conspire with players and share in the profits.

Yet I never hear of this happening.

A good test would be to get somebody who claims to be able to influence the roll and have him attempt to land it in a particular half of the wheel as many times as possible over 100 spins.

The more times he makes it the greater weight his claim will have.

The table below shows the probability of 50 to 70 successful spins.

For example, the probability of 60 or more successful spins is 2.

Common confidence thresholds in statistics are the 90%, 95%, and 99% levels.

To beat a 90% confidence test, in which the probability of failing given random spins is 90%, the number of successful spins would need to be 57 or more.

To beat a 95% test the number would need to be 59 or more, and at 99% the number would need to be 63 or more.

Wins Probability 70 0.

Are there any systems that would be effective since there is no zero?

Without the zero could one effectively play both black and red at the same time since there is no fear of the zero?

I tried to find that game but the best roulette strategy dozens was down when I checked.

However, assuming such a game did exist, the answer is no.

No system could be expected to beat it, nor lose to it, over the long-run.

The expected value of every system would be exactly zero.

What is the probability of more info any one number 0-36 come up more than once in three consecutive spins?

Thanks for you time!

I think you may be interested in this.

I use Betfair here in the UK.

I am sure you nice people in America are not allowed to use it for some reason, anyway if you are not familiar with it go to betfair.

It is a betting exchange, not a bookmakers.

Anyway, my question is this.

They are now offering roulette with NO ZERO, yes no zero.

It is genuine really.

Can you think of a good strategy one could use, and if so would you keep it to yourself?

They offer other casino games with no house edge too.

I tried to sign up for an account there to check this out but they block U.

Even in a zero house edge game like no-zero roulette there is still no betting system that will get above, or below, that 0% figure.

No matter what you do the more you do best roulette strategy dozens it the closer the actual house win will get to 0%.

Gonzalo Garcia-Pelayo and his family won a lot of money in many casinos all over the world.

They even published a book, and describe how they did it.

I saw a television show about him once, and I applaud what he did.

What successfully did was survey how often the ball landed in each number, in an effort to find, and then exploit, biased roulette wheels.

This I would call a strategy, as opposed to a system.

There are lots of profitable strategies for beating the casinos, but zero profitable betting systems.

If I show you a Roulette game with no zeros and all usual roulette rules apply, is it possible to win 100% of the time?

It just has number 1-36, and all the standard roulette rules apply.

Do you see any way to take advantage of this?

There must be a money management system that could work profitably with these table limits.

Any advice is appreciated.

Thanks for the kind words.

Hello, for obvious reasons I would appreciate if you not share my name with anyone.

At the casino where I work, there is virtual unanimity amongst the roulette dealers that they can "control the spin" and hit sections of the wheel with ease or miss other sections on purpose.

Given all the factors in the spin of a ball in roulette, including the canoes bumps on the side, direction of ball and speed of wheel, etc.

Would it be enough that a crooked dealer could help a player overcome the huge house advantage?

This is far from the first source I have heard this claim, and I am very skeptical of it.

Most dealers also believe myths like a bad third-baseman will cause the other players to lose in blackjack, so as a group they are not the most skeptical bunch.

What I think is happening is they remember the times they were successful at attempting to control the spin, and conveniently forget the times they were not.

If dealers really could do this, it would be easy to have a confederate play, causing him to win, and causing other players to lose, to make up for it.

Yet, you never hear about this happening.

I suppose the believers could say that those doing it are just keeping a low profile, but that is what believers in worthless betting systems say too.

If this were as easy as the roulette dealers where you work claim, the cheating problem as a result would be rampant.

In double-zero roulette, what is the probability that any number will not have hit by the 200th spin?

The reason this is incorrect is it double counts two numbers not being hit.

So we need to subtract those probabilities out.

click here need to subtract the probability of avoiding both numbers.

However, now we have canceled out the probability of three numbers not hitting.

For any given group of three numbers, we triple counted the probability of any single number not being hit.

We then triple subtracted for each way to choose two numbers out of the three, leaving with zero for the probability that all three numbers were not hit.

Yet, now we have over-counted the probability of four numbers not hitting.

Then we added back in the 4 groups of 3 out of the 4.

To adjust for the double counting we must subtract for each group.

Continuing in the process we would keep alternating adding and subtracting, all the way until missing 37 numbers.

Numbers Hit Observations Ratio 31 or Less 0 0 32 1 0.

I have a friend who was part of a casino staff who watched over roulette tables, and he told check this out that when people start to win the casino changes the croupier.

I have also seen a member of the staff ask a croupier to spin the roulette wheel at a different speed.

Sadly, ignorance can go pretty high up the ladder.

However, that issue aside, changing dealers does not change the odds.

There is no such thing as a lucky or an unlucky dealer.

Superstition is a difficult thing to let go of.

As I have said many times, the more ridiculous a belief is, the more tenaciously it tends to be held.

Dear sir, I "clocked" an automated single-zero roulette game for 8672 best free multiplayer game />My predetermined number came up an amazing 278 times.

I chose the number because of the wear and tear of the pocket.

If my terminology is correct, "clocking a wheel" means to predict where the ball will land judging by the ball speed, ball location, and wheel speed.

It sounds like what you are doing is exploiting a biased wheel, which is a different please click for source play.

This allows the player to predict where the ball will land based on ball location and past results.

The standard deviation is the square root of the variance, or 15.

The click to see more for subtracting 0.

Suffice it to say it is an adjustment factor for using a continuous function to estimate a discrete function.

Doing a Gaussian approximation, the probability of hitting your number that many times, or more, is 0.

So, there is a good chance you found a biased wheel.

However, there is still a 1 in 466 chance it was just good luck.

There is a well-known story about a freeze-out competition between a Japanese high roller, Kashiwagi, and Donald Trump, that took place 20 years ago.

Assume that Kashiwagi always bet the maximum on Banker.

What is the probability that Kashiwagi will win?

The math works out more easily if he bet on the Player.

I work out a similar problem in roulette at my mathproblems.

It is much more complicated on the Banker bet, because of the 5% commission.

That would result in the distinct possibility of the player overshooting his goal.

This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site.

Counting the first trial, I show the mean is 8.

So the probability of a repeat within 8 numbers is 100% - 45.

I suspect most people would estimate that that probability of a repeat within 8 numbers would be less than that.

So you would be betting on 8 or fewer, and your friend 9 or more.

Basically, whichever side covers the median of 8 is likely to win.

This question was raised and discussed in the forum of my companion site.

No, he is not correct.

In all bet calculations, round down.

In other words, always try to reach the goal, with just one bet, if you can, without exceeding the goal.

If there are multiple ways to accomplish this, then go with the one with the greatest probability of winning.

What about other games, you might ask?

According to the Discovery Channel voice-over guy, "Everyone agrees that roulette is the best get rich quick scheme in the casino.

Even limiting ourselves to common games and rules, I find craps to be better.

In particular, betting the don't pass and laying the odds.

This assumes the player may lay 6x odds, regardless of the point which is the case when 3x-4x-5x odds are allowed taking the odds.

This probability of success is 0.

In that case, the probability of success using my Hail Mary strategy is 2.

In both cases, greater than the 2.

In all fairness, the Discovery Channel would have never put the insane rant above on the air and was surely looking for something simple that the masses would understand.

Andy was surely giving them something they wanted to hear.

The basic premise of his advice is that if you want to reach a certain goal, then a hit-and-run strategy is much better than letting the house edge grind you down with multiple bets.

That is definitely true and something I've been preaching for 17 years.

Wizard's "Hail Mary" strategy for craps.

In calculating bets, never bet so much that you overshoot the goal.

Also, never make a bet amount that will cause you to get rounded down.

Otherwise, lay whatever you can.

So, I hope Andy and the Discovery Channel are happy.

I've spent days running simulations to prove them wrong.

This question was raised and discussed on my forum at.

What is the probability of the ball landing in 1, 2, and 3 within 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 spins in roulette?

The general formula is: Pr Ball lands in 1 + Pr Ball lands in 2 + Pr Ball lands in 3 - Pr Ball lands in 1 and 2 - Pr Ball lands in 1 and 3 - Pr Ball lands in 2 and 3 + Pr Ball lands in 1, 2, and 3.

The following table shows the probability of rolling all three numbers for various number of spins from 3 to 100 for single- best roulette strategy dozens double-zero roulette.

Spins Single Zero Double Zero 3 0.

If bets on these outcomes paid the usual 35 to 1, then the house edge would be exactly 0%.

The house edge on any bet on the numbers 1 to 36 would be 5.

read article that to the 5.

My advice in this game would be to bet the zero and double-zero only.

If anyone can confirm or deny these rules and pays, please let me know.

I recorded 7,456 spins in roulette.

The results are as follows.

I suspect the wheel is biased but am not sure if the data is conclusive enough to play it.

Winning Number Occurences 0 204 28 214 9 175 26 177 30 203 11 181 7 223 20 205 32 184 17 222 5 224 22 241 34 194 15 210 3 209 24 176 36 203 13 217 1 217 00 197 27 173 10 195 25 198 29 217 12 197 8 207 19 163 31 180 18 201 6 186 21 203 33 171 16 164 4 200 23 191 35 163 14 177 2 194 Total 7456 The following graph shows your results in sequential order on the wheel.

The blue line shows your results.

The red line is the number you need, 207.

A chi-squared test on this distribution comes back with a statistic of 68.

The probability of a result this skewed or more is 1 in 725.

I don't think the chi-squared is the perfect test for this situation because it doesn't consider the ordering of the outcomes, but don't know of a better test.

Some have suggested thebut I don't think that is appropriate.

If there visit web page any other appropriate tests, I'm all ears.

I can say if you had bet the 3-number arc around the number 5, you would have had a 10.

However, if you increased that to a 7-number arc, the advantage drops to 2.

If forced to an answer in plain simple English, I would say the wheel shows evidence, but not proof beyond a reasonable doubt, that the wheel is biased.

However, that bias is probably not enough to significantly and confidently overcome the house edge.

Assuming the casino doesn't switch around the wheels among the tables, I would say that more data should be collected casino best michigan betting large amounts of money.

I'm sorry this answer is so noncommittal.

This question is raised and discussed in my forum at.

In single-zero roulette, what is the mean and median number of spins required for every number to appear at least once?

Answering the mean is much easier, so we'll start with that.

The median is much more complicated.

To find the exact answer, as opposed to using a random simulation, one needs to use a lot of matrix Algebra.

I've discussed how to solve similar problems in other Ask the Wizard questions, so I won't go through the details again.

One example of a similar question is the one on getting a 6-6 pair in the hole three times in a row, as discussed in.

Suffice it to say that the probability of seeing every number in 145 spins is 0.

Thus, the median is 146.

This question is asked and discussed in my forum at.

If a ball landed in red the last 20 spins in roulette, what is the probability it will land in black the next spin?

I think you're wrong about the previous question.

The odds must overwhelmingly favor black.

That's true, but it doesn't matter.

The fact is the past doesn't matter in games of independent trials like roulette.

I've thought of a way to beat the casinos in roulette!

Start with a small wager on any even-money bet, like red or black.

If it loses, then double the bet on the same thing.

Then keeping doubling until it wins.

The winning outcome has to happen eventually and when it does I'll profit my original wager.

What is your opinion?

Also, please don't https://yournaughtystory.com/best/best-slot-games-to-play-free-online.html anybody.

This is probably the most popular of all betting systems, known as the Martingale.

Gamblers have been conceiving of it and using it since time immemorial.

Like all betting systems, not only doesn't it beat the house advantage, it doesn't even dent it.

The reason is the gambler will eventually have a bad losing streak where his bankroll isn't enough to make another double.

In your previous answer, you explained why the Martingale doesn't work.

Then how about the opposite, doubling your bet after each win until a desired target is hit?

This is known as the anti-Martingale and is equally worthless.

The times your bankroll gets grinded down to nothing will outweigh the winnings when you hit your target.

Regardless of what betting system you use, or none at all, the more you play, the more your ratio of money lost to money bet will approach 5.

Sign Up For Updates You're Subscribed!

Enter your email address below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter along with other special announcements from The Wizard of Odds!

The Best Roulette Strategy For A Superior Experience.. When you play with the Dozens and Columns strategy, you combine any two of the ...

Enjoy!

Valid for casinos

I Believe I Have a Roulette System That Works - Betting Systems - Gambling - Page 1 - Forums - Wizard of Vegas I don't care who knows about it and I'm not trying to sell it.I know some of the members on this site have coding expeariance as does the site owner and I just want someone to proove me wrong, if I am!

On a normal roulette table there are several ways to bet, some of the odds are seemingly good 17-1 53-1 but I prefer the 2-1 bets, these are streets and the 12s.

I believe I saw on one site a stat of 31.

The few times I have been to casinos with real roulette, I play two of them usually the outside two.

If the ball lands on any one number on those two lines you win 2-1 which means you loose one bet and tripple the other giving you a gain of 1 betting unit per bet.

If best roulette strategy dozens stat I saw was right 31.

We'll do them right in a row.

It is still a loser.

This is how James Bond played Roulette in the book not movie "Casino Royale", so you're not the first to think of it.

I've tried it a few times and it seemed boring and didn't make me any significant money.

I don't have anything that runs long-term projections for Roulette or I'd do those for best roulette strategy dozens />I am guessing that best roulette strategy dozens ends up being very close to the HE, though.

If this system worked consistently, Roulette would have been modified to reduce its effectiveness by now.

Quote: heather This is how James Bond played Roulette in the book not movie "Casino Royale", so you're not the first to think of it.

I've tried it a few times and it seemed boring and didn't make me any significant money.

I don't have anything that runs long-term projections for Roulette or I'd do those for you.

I am guessing that it ends up being very close to the HE, though.

If this system worked consistently, Roulette would have been modified to reduce its effectiveness by continue reading />I played this way for several days in Las Vegas on one of our earlier trips.

I lost a lot of money and had a host want best roulette strategy dozens meet me.

Unless you are a really high-level player at a low house edge game, meeting a host is not a good sign!!!

Ignore the layout of the felt.

Sometimes you will be betting the first and second dozenthe second and the third dozenor the third and the first dozen.

Once you have mastered this you can go further and eliminate 2 numbers from the 24 pockets and operate on a reduced scale.

Just keep following the action of the wheel.

WASHOO2 Come on guys.

The EV of the combined bet is -2.

The two-dozen best roulette strategy dozens is as good or as bad as any other bet you make.

The only thing best roulette strategy dozens chances is variance.

But if you want low variance, why don't you play the triple dozen bet?

I have an online casino that I offer to all my players.

I would be thrilled if they would use the system.

It went very well.

Number of players to believe best casinos in il have a long-term winning betting system.

Number of players to believe they could best roulette strategy dozens a casino game equal or better to what is out there now.

Number of players to believe both A and B.

Number of times somebody has remarked "The hard part is keeping the weight off" in the HB challenge thread.

My wife Who hates gambling has played Roulette 7 total times and won 5 times with the same number in 3 different countries: The 17 What are the odds of that???

Last victory was last Saturday.

Las Vegas discussion forum - I Believe I Have a Roulette System That Works,. If the ball lands on any one number on those two lines you win 2-1 which.. The two-dozen bet is as good (or as bad) as any other bet you make.

Enjoy!

Valid for casinos

How to Earn Playing Casino Roulette Two Dozen with a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Betting Sequence ✔
Check out the favourite dozen strategy for the game of roulette. Examples and step by step instructions.

Enjoy!

SIC-BO SYSTEMS - NEW!

ROULETTE SYSTEMS - NEW!

BACCARAT SYSTEMS - NEW!

Then get your own free subscription right here.

Enter your e-mail address for immediate delivery of an introductory issue, including a FREE ROULETTE SYSTEM: It's Free Below is a selection of the most recommended on-line casinos and sportsbooks Check out: "Most powerful roulette system ever" SRDDW Single Repeat Dozen Double Win Roulette System "has absolutely no abandoned runs" by Izak Matatya Here is my latest system - SRDDW - the Single Repeat Dozen Double Win Roulette system.

It feels like the name says it all.

Yes, it's only a Roulette system, since it bets on Dozens and remarkable, best simple roulette strategy forum was bets on single dozens for repeating dozens and closes runs on poker rooms bonus best wins.

However, there is a lot more to it than that.

Yes, a traditional system could make some profits this way, but it would require the betting of hundreds of units for a lot of runs and the end profit would not exceed some 900 units for the entire 15,000 spins of the Zumma tester book.

SRDDW uses a very special technique, method and money management to avoid bets to reach high amounts and the end profit attains +2,398 units without a single abandoned run.

Yes, every run is completed with either 1 or 2 units profit.

Bets normally do not reach high levels like the older traditional systems.

The method is totally out of the box, very different than the others you're acquainted with.

Runs are not closed the traditional way.

Counts are not reset the way you are used to when runs are closed.

Runs may start with profits of 6-10 units, which are used to our advantage in order not to raise bets throughout the entire run.

The main disadvantage of the traditional systems in double win strategies were the numerous single wins, that required the raising of the bets in order to close runs on the second consecutive win.

It's no longer the case with SRDDW, which terminates a large percentage of all runs within 1 unit flat bet best roulette strategy dozens even after a large number of single wins.

This is due to the ingenuity of this new method of betting.

After having designed 59 systems, I needed to come up with something with a totally different concept and SRDDW is the result of this recent extensive research.

The following chart shows the tremendous performance of this system unmatched to any other system's performance.

A linearly rising profit chart with no losing runs whatsoever on a double zero Roulette game with 5.

The system comes with a full MS-Excel simulation of the entire Zumma 15,000 spins verified for authenticity and integrity.

You can study the details of each run and see how each one of them is closed fully.

The maximum bet limit is set to 223 units, which enables this performance.

This high bet is placed only once throughout the entire system.

The remaining time bets are controlled at a pretty low level.

A lifetime bankroll of 668 units are sufficient should you ever start your play with the worse case scenario.

Otherwise, click at this page units are the lowest you can ever go with this system, before you reach +2,398 units at the end of 15,000 spins.

This gives you an average profit of 1 unit every 6.

If a spin takes a minute, the system will profit you 10 units per hour.

The system is not complex and the new concept will be simple to understand when you study the fully detailed two examples.

Blank templates are provided for you to print and take to the casino in order to use the system most efficiently.

As usual, your full satisfaction is guaranteed.

If not, you can have your money back within 30 days of your purchase, no strings attached, no questions asked.

Click to order and a download link will open immediately after your payment online.

Izak Matatya Email: or Systems Gallery: Newsletter: Newsletter Archive: Recommended On-Line Casinos: Discussion Forum: Latest Gambling News: New Art Gallery: Izak Matatya's art works: Frequently Asked Questions best roulette strategy dozens SRDDW Single Repeat Dozen Double Win Roulette System First of all, some testimonials: "I think this is the ideal system to meet my needs!

This will depend like everything else what your expectations are for a system.

Some people will question putting 297 units or 260 units on a single bet.

What I would say to them is what do you expect from a system that bets every decision and is attempting to overcome a HE of over 5% bets are going to get large.

I think this is the ideal system to meet my needs and here is why: I play for comps and make my real money playing craps as posted here on LTW.

Over the past 4 to 6 best roulette strategy dozens I had the idea of playing video roulette betting red and black at the same time and only starting system play after some 0 or 00 only long enough to recover units lost and then go back and flat bet.

This can be https://yournaughtystory.com/best/best-online-casino-match-bonus-usa.html for 25 cent bets and can earn your free rooms meals and such.

Well from what I can see the newest system will allow me to do the same thing and control at what point I would like to start system play.

Izak needs to produce a system that does not take breaks or stop play and I think he has done a great job with this system So much so I was going to go play it live today but work has called and I must go work a 16 hour shift Things you may want to know: 1 Pen a paper needed 2 Each spin you write down 10 things to fill out the template 3 Some simple math skills are need or a calculator on a phone Due to these 3 factors I was going to play live and win back only money lost on zeros until I had felt like I could write 10 things down between spins and do the simple math in a timely manner.

If you want to bet every out come but keep bets lower Try the Parlay system the last roulette only system before this one came out.

Even if you are reading this and saying so what he back tested it and got it to work that was some kind of back testing.

And my entry points for live play will allow us to identify just how many bets are needed to close every run in a worse case on a run from hell not found in Zumma I will address this now 2,398 units without a single abandoned run.

Comes out to 599.

Also I would like to know if you bet every outcome.

A: Quoting from the system document: "All the runs throughout the entire Zumma 15,000 spins are closed provided we have set a maximum bet limit of 223 units.

To set this limit means that if the next bet exceeds this amount, which happens to be 334, we close the run after that, regardless of if we win the bet or not.

We happen to win it.

A total of 986 runs were closed.

The highest drawdown is -668, which is twice the placed bet of 334 units, which happens only once at spin 13,563.

The remaining time the bets remain way under.

Now, if we set this limit to bet 200, the highest bet becomes: Max bet limit: 200 Actual max bet placed: 297 End Profit: 1732 Drawdown: -667 with only one abandoned run.

Two abandoned runs would be with the following parameters: Max bet limit: 180 Actual max bet placed: 260 End Profit: 1144 Drawdown: -667 etc.

Q: Do you feel that there is read article difference in Air ball, video, and live roulette?

A: Absolutely no difference between any type of roulette.

Any table would generate a random number best roulette strategy dozens 0 and 36 and that's all the system cares about.

A: Well, just by visualization, you can tell any three same dozens showing up in bold below shows a double win, thus the surely closure of a run with a profit.

It may even show profits, as each win gives you the double of what you have bet.

Thus a sequence of 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 is a W L W L L L W L W after the third run above and which does not have any double wins, gives more profits than losses.

Q: What do we do about on-line casinos, which have only a range of 1-100, if the bets go above 100?

A: What you can do is to navigate tables.

They are both at the range of 1-100, but starting with the small limit and navigating to a larger limit is equivalent of using a 1-1000 type of table.

As far as the system and the outcome is concerned this does not constitute a problem.

Q: Would your system work for Baccarat?

A: Yes, as a matter of fact, I just applied the new concept best roulette strategy dozens the 1000 Baccarat shoes and the result was an end profit of +2,866.

Max bet limit was 212 units, similar to the roulette version.

Purchasers can request this Baccarat simulation and I will send it to them with no extra charge.

Q: Izak you mentioned this system will also work for Bac making 2800+ units for the 1000 Zuma shoes.

How is this possible when you are making even money bets in Bac and 2 to 1 bets in roulette?

Does this infer it can play other even money games such as craps?

A: I don't see why not.

For 15,000 roulette spins, you're making 2400 units, thus averaging 0.

You can increase the average in either mode or game.

For instance, in Baccarat you could bet a unit or two more while closing a run and this will amount to a profit of 3336.

In Roulette, you can double your profits, too, by applying the same strategy for columns simultaneously.

You need to consider the speed of the game, as well.

A roulette spin may take a minute and more in crowded tables.

A Baccarat decision is 3-4 times faster.

So your average profit may reach similar proportions.

In Craps, a Pass-line or Don't Pass-line decision could be also slower, but the strategy is equally applicable.

I thank all of you for your feedback, review and reporting on the system.

As usual, your full satisfaction is guaranteed.

If not, you can have your money back within 30 days of your purchase, no strings attached, no questions asked.

Click to order and a download link will open immediately after your payment online.

Wishing you all the best!

Izak Email: or Systems Gallery: Newsletter: Newsletter Archive: Recommended On-Line Casinos: Discussion Forum: Latest Gambling News: New Art Gallery: Izak Matatya's art works: Use SRDDW at.

Software - MORE

Thus, when playing roulette, as when you play Slot Games, your biggest task is working out which betting strategy represents the best overall chance of a profit.

Enjoy!

PLAY DOZENS AND WIN 98.27% of THE TIME!. bias) are so good spotting the best landing zone with plenty of effort, how come they won't be ...

Enjoy!

Software - MORE

This betting system is called Favorite Dozen. You will need to have at least 40 chips to apply the strategy. This means that if the min bet is $1 your bankroll.

Enjoy!

Software - MORE

23 (betting on 19-36 and the 1st Dozen turns this into a win!) This is truly the World's Best and Safest Roulette System. Good luck. And don't forget to thoroughly ...

Enjoy!